The Soul
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI_F4nOKDSM Robert Lanza on theory of Biocentrism
scienceandnonduality
https://youtu.be/zI_F4nOKDSM
Start at:
1:31
Uploaded on Jun 6, 2011
This is part 1 of Rober Lanza's talk on Biocentrism at the Science and Nonduality Conference 2010.
http://www.scienceandnonduality.com
Watch part 2 here: http://youtu.be/Yw55BsToVZM
Category
Education
License
Standard YouTube License
SHOW LESS
COMMENTS • 1,368
Oscar del Rosario
Add a public comment...
Top comments
Emoshy88
Emoshy881 year ago
We already had this theory for thousands of yesrs... It's called Hinduism and Buddhism :)
Reply 50
View all 42 replies
Razor Skidrow
Razor Skidrow3 months ago
@Sinneral Juri you little shit, stop talking about Hinduis when you know nothing about it.
Reply
Razor Skidrow
Razor Skidrow3 months ago
Hinsuims is shit compared to Buddhism? Stop talking shit if you don't know anything about Hinduism
Reply
olamotor
olamotor7 months ago
Joe Rogan Experience #812 - Russell Brand
Reply 34
jake tyler
jake tyler6 months ago
#POWERFUL
by the way...hands down one of my fav JRE episodes ever. Been waiting to see Russell on forever.
Reply 1
Mike D
Mike D5 months ago
Yep...I came because of that episide
Reply
Qishi Li
Qishi Li6 months ago
This theory is absolutely amazing. Because from one end, I read about Buddhist ideas and Buddha said a long time ago that the world exist only because of our observing. Everything is there only because we're conscious. And the world is merely an illusion. This is the first time I saw a scientist came up with a scholarly theory that agrees with this Buddhist claim. I'd recommend researchers of Biocentricsm also look up some Buddhist texts as possible reference.
Read more
Reply 34
View all 13 replies
Susazeu
Susazeu1 month ago
Chaos theory explains mathematically what Grant J is explaining, and deeply intertwined with quantum mechanics.
Reply
Karanbir Singh
Karanbir Singh3 weeks ago
+Grant J Once again, you are forgetting the context. I CANNOT STRESS ENOUGH HOW DELICATE QUANTUM SYSTEMS ARE! It appears that you have never studied quantum mechanics and are following the pop culture trend of applying quantum mechanics to classical situations without taking into account the fact that quantum mechanics does not translate into the classical world. "Directly" and "indirectly" have very special meanings at the quantum level that you are outright ignoring.
Read more
Reply 1
Equilibrium
Equilibrium2 months ago
I'm too stoned to comprehend this shit
Reply 22
clovis2012
clovis20123 months ago
Paaaahhticles
Reply 14
View all 3 replies
James Penno
James Penno2 months ago
clovis2012 I'm an Aussie - That's literally our accent haha.
Reply 1
Mikael Liedbergius
Mikael Liedbergius2 months ago
Biocentrism
Reply
Roy Dopson
Roy Dopson2 years ago (edited)
Perhaps the most enlightened being to ever walk the planet, Ramana Maharshi, on the nature of reality and the means by which to abide in/as that which is real. As Mr. Lanza states, the Self creates the world, and therefor is ultimate reality. Misinterpreting (via thought) physicality as ultimate reality is the source of all vexation and suffering.
I suggest starting at minute 6.
Who Am I - Ramana Maharshi Audio Book
Read more
Reply 12
View all 45 replies
Michael Maitri
Michael Maitri2 years ago
~ The right perception of reality ~ Requires the right perspective ~ The right perspective ~ Requires an expanded awareness ~ An expanded awareness ~ Requires the right mindfulness ~ The right mindfulness ~ Requires a brain and qualia experiences ~
Reply 12
View all 3 replies
S. Darakhshan
S. Darakhshan1 year ago
+Samuraisahsah Do psychedelics and have and open heart and mind and allow life and the universe to reveal itself to you
Reply 3
10908070605040302
109080706050403021 year ago
+Samuraisahsah His point is that you cant quench your thirst by thinking about Water, you have to Drink it. Same with feeling the "Right perception of Reality", there is no combination of words that you can read that will make you understand it, you have to try it for yourself !
Reply
Mr. K
Mr. K2 years ago
Evolution always muddys the waters. One day the THEORY of evolution will be dead, and I hope I am still alive to laugh at all the people who believed in it :)
Reply 24
View all 29 replies
Gary McCaffrey
Gary McCaffrey1 year ago
+chefjimmie1 "Creationwiki.org" or Answers in Genesis? Give me a fucking break, I have looked and laughed before, they are full of absolute horse shit!!
And for your information, I believe in a God of sorts, I don't follow any religion, and I don't pretend I know what God is, but I believe in a collective consciousness of which we are all part of, I have experienced that 'oneness' consciousness many times, and I believe that that consciousness is another realm of existence beyond our current physical reality. I tie that consciousness into the idea of 'God'. BUt I don't pretend I can understand or explain it.
Evolution and the idea of a 'God' are not at odds with each other. Unless you follow a dogmatic, 'paint by numbers' religion like you do, where creative, adaptive thought and reason are disallowed, because the truth shatters your entire belief system.
The fossil records prove evolution to be a fact, not to mention it makes fucking sense when you look around, we share much of our DNA with absolutely every other creature.
A human embryo is in many ways identical to countless other species', indicating a common evolutionary ancestor.
Put it this way, ALL reasonable evidence points to evolution, and listen to this, absolutely not one single god damn thing, not one single shred of evidence exists for creationism, absolutely nothing.
BTW, don't pretend you understand thermodynamics, and only idiots 'like' their own fucking posts.
Read more
Reply 2
Justin Arends
Justin Arends1 year ago (edited)
+chefjimmie1 spoken like someone who doesn't have ANY idea of what evolution is.
You seem to also be confused about what the definition of "adaptation" is.
Creationists love quoting the first law of thermodynamics as well, without knowing what the fuck thermodynamics is.
How about be an objective critical thinker rather than scouring google and copy pasting information from non-credible sources to support your pre-existing beliefs?
Read more
Reply 5
kevnar
kevnar3 years ago
I think, therefore you are.
Reply 9
FocusReborn
FocusReborn1 year ago
It's pretty much impossible to deny at this point that the first principle of Biocentrism is pretty much a fact. Reality IS a process which involves our consciousness.
Reply 14
View all 11 replies
Kevin Osborne
Kevin Osborne7 months ago
You assume that creating one's reality means having full control. One controls only when one is fully conscious, which most folks on earth are a long way from. Look at the size of the earth relative to the universe and the speed at which we travel relative to the speed of light. We are very limited in our view of this place. As one sees more, it begins to fit together and make sense.
Read more
Reply
The God Effect
The God Effect5 months ago
Except you're wrong. It appears that way. It's the measurement itself that affects the system, the collapse of the wave function in quantum mechanics. In other words, the macroscopic measurement, whether by laser or electron micrography, or accelerometers, perturbs the quantum wave into a definite/discrete state. Not the human observation. That is the fallacy of this thinking, pseudoscientific babble from an MD with no understanding of quantum mechanics.
Read more
Reply
PJ Butler
PJ Butler2 years ago
The theory of Biocentrism would make better sense if our consciousness were part of a collective of all consciousnesses. Maybe we are the singularity before the so called Big Bang. If the universe behaves as a holograph, then possibly projected from us at the God consciousness that we are apart of. Possibly the beginning, the now, and 13.4 billion years out there is the projection of the collective, since it appears to us all the same. Now, for my third cup of coffee.
Read more
Reply 6
View all 15 replies
Sarah Jones
Sarah Jones2 years ago
you will also find that the age of the universe is wrong as well, the earth in itself is 646 billion years old why space is 36 trillion yrs old, remember the scientists only measure from the observeable universe which is 13.7 billion yrs, but in spiritual circles we know, especially the most accurate contact on this planet , billy meier and other spiritual people who had expereinces claim it's between 21-36 trillion yrs old , so in other words a 36 trillion yr old hologram. older hologram universes exist as well as younger, the consciousness created everything, not god , god is consciousness, but not god and jesus
Read more
Reply
PJ Butler
PJ Butler2 years ago
+Sarah Jones Much we do not know, though through the annals of history, threads of truths are passed along, Science acts like the denier of facts. A war goes on our consciousness. Energy exist within our bodies which seems to be separate from our directing conscientiousness. Our physical bodies are nothing more than a vessel, our brains a receiver for directions, a free will to chose a path. Alas, a cup of coffee awaits
Read more
Reply
Daniel Carr
Daniel Carr9 months ago
I'm trying to understand this point of view. Can someone who understand this explain this to me: 'So, if consciousness creates the reality we see, how come everyone sees the same reality'?
Reply 6
View all 23 replies
Mirakelbabe
Mirakelbabe3 months ago
Yes That was my questen too!
Reply
the81kid
the81kid3 months ago
+The God Effect
I assume you mean Sam Harris, who is hardly a great intellectual.
Reply
Lizzy H
Lizzy H11 months ago
did he say idear?
Reply 6
Roberto Yelil
Roberto Yelil2 years ago
Funny how I have never heard of this guy before... I must have created him just now... :D
Reply 5
PRAVEEN GOYAL
PRAVEEN GOYAL6 months ago
All his thoughts are arising from ancient Hindu vedic texts. He is just reading them.
Reply 6
Sergiuss555
Sergiuss5553 months ago
your hindu texts are just a collection of bullshit fantasies.
Reply
Raptor Jesus
Raptor Jesus1 year ago (edited)
sounds very wacky,
he actually says "your mind has the power to create space and time."...
he's also using the "god of the gaps" argument, (science can't explain it (yet) therefore his idea must be right!)
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Read more
Reply 7
Ann Black
Ann Black1 year ago (edited)
I am trying to grasp all this but I will say one thing this guy does not look nearly 60 yrs old.Seems to me he has a clue about how to slow down aging.
Reply 5
Brian Fletcher
Brian Fletcher1 year ago
The science "priests" perceptions are now under threat. Time for an Inquisition.
The ancient Greeks made it clear, that reality is where we are looking from, not what we are looking at. "If you wish to know the universe, "KNOW THYSELF".
You can believe/disbelieve this or know it. What is the difference? One is based on second hand observation, the other awakening consciousness of clarity. If it was just intellectual, then men with Lanza's qualifications would be reading off the same page (which, based on biocentrism, is a holographic projection, by definition.)
OK lets build the "stake" Who is willing to light the pyre? We could use such "pages" as a fire starter.....;-)
Read more
Reply 6
John
John1 year ago
So how do you know that you're not massively schizophrenic and living in a hallucination or dream?
Reply 4
Paul Folsom
Paul Folsom1 year ago
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." - Aldous Huxley
Reply 4
Show more
No comments:
Post a Comment